Don't Slow Down
- Antonia Piercey

- May 4, 2021
- 3 min read
I can't believe I am more than halfway done with Spring Quarter and can soon experience Summer Vacation. However, I must not let the amazing feeling of relaxation and the beach get in my head and instead continue to work hard in my courses.
This week on Twitter I specifically followed accounts that highlight dog science and discuss the many intelligent characteristics and qualities dogs possess. After searching long and hard for new accounts, the most interesting one I followed was @OHAIRElab. This Twitter account is run by Dr. Maggie O'Haire and is an organization that focuses on Human-Animal Interaction Research and Education. There were many studies and information tweeted that illustrates how humans and dogs communicate and understand each other's forms of expression. Furthermore, the most interesting tweet I saw was actually by a classmate, Marina. She explained that dogs can attempt to show dominance not only towards other dogs, but towards humans as well. For instance, a dog pulling on a leash can be considered to be an act of dominance, which is something I never knew. My dogs do that all the time, but now I feel like I need to teach them not to pull on the leash and walk beside me. I even tried something completely new this week. I went hashtag surfing and found some hashtags that were very useful in terms of dog science. Specifically, a few hashtags that were most effective were #dogintelligence, #dogemotion, #dogcommunication, #dogbehavior, and #dogcognition. I did not come up with all these hashtags by myself. I learned that I can use one hashtag to discover another if they are somewhat correlated. This also helped me come across new accounts that tweeted using one of the hashtags I searched. Overall, this experience was helpful and I plan on using it next time to find more accounts about dog science.
In addition, I commented on Kailea's Research Agenda Page. As a whole, it was very appealing and inviting to read. Her layout and design of the page was very organized and spaced, which caused her annotations to stand out. This great organizational style allowed me to distinguish the three studies and their annotations from one another. Moreover, I gave her advice about making sure her sources were connected since they seemed to discuss two different animals. She also did not include summaries of the studys’ results, so I suggested that she should consider including that in her annotations. Once she includes the results, I believe her annotations will become less vague and instead be filled with strong details. Her page and research has great potential and I am interested in discovering what she does next.

I believe this was my best tweet of the week because it not only shows that dogs understand human emotions, but that they also respond in a way that is affected by a human's expressions. If a dog senses that their owner is angry for instance, their heart rate may increase as they wonder why their owner is mad. This example of dogs experiencing stress could be because their instinct makes them uneasy when they see bared teeth. Therefore, I included this in my blog because I want people to know that dogs truly are intelligent animals, especially when it comes to understanding emotion and communication. A link is provided in the tweet as well if students would like to learn more about this aspect.



BRYAN'S REVIEW OF ANTONIA'S RESEARCH AGENDA PAGE:
Based on your annotations from your “Big 3” research studies, I can conclude that you seem to be focusing on the topic of cognitive intelligence in dogs. All three of your articles seem to be actual research studies that seem to be about determining intelligence in dogs. Considering that your most recent article was published in 2017 and the oldest in 2001, I would say that the articles are timely. You did a good job of establishing the credentials of the authors, however, you did not give any background information for a specific author. It might be helpful to choose one of the researchers from the article that seem to be the most…
SHIQI'S REVIEW OF ANTONIA'S RESEARCH AGENDA PAGE:
All of the articles seem to be a research article from the title and annotation as I am able to quickly grasp the main idea from the title. The first two are more recent ones and the last one is a bit timely, which is around 20 years ago. By just reading the annotations, these studies are connected as all of them are research direct or indirect proof of dog intelligence.
The annotations do cover the basics, and the annotations are full of good details. I am able to quickly learn her topic is dog intelligence and see how this research helps with the topic.
The webpage is an appealing page as I…
Kevin's Review of Antonia's Research Agenda Page
1. Quality of the "big 3" sources
All of the sources listed are research studies, which is really good! The historical spread of the studies is also pretty good, ranging from 2001 to 2017, which covers a good chunk of time in the development of this field. The sources (judging from the titles) all seem to involve dogs and their cognition (or maybe social intelligence)
2. Annotations
The first annotation covers the credentials of the author, but the second and third don't really introduce the authors as well as the first. I think that introducing the researchers by name and including what organization they were affiliated with (like in the first annotation) would…
Review of Research Agenda:
Hi Antonia, I really enjoyed reading your annotations! They were very insightful and gave me a good summary of the articles, methods, authors, and the conclusions. Your articles all seem to be based on showing that dogs are intelligent because of their awareness. It's also good that there are gaps in between the years they were written because I feel like it can help show the development with dog research. I really like the layout of this page because of the picture of the dog in the beginning, it's so cute and it instantly gives a clue as to what your annotations are about.